@article {106, title = {Community-based recruitment and exome sequencing indicates high diagnostic yield in adults with intellectual disability.}, journal = {Mol Genet Genomic Med}, volume = {8}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 10}, pages = {e1439}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Establishing a genetic diagnosis for individuals with intellectual disability (ID) benefits patients and their families as it may inform the prognosis, lead to appropriate therapy, and facilitate access to medical and supportive services. Exome sequencing has been successfully applied in a diagnostic setting, but most clinical exome referrals are pediatric patients, with many adults with ID lacking a comprehensive genetic evaluation.

METHODS: Our unique recruitment strategy involved partnering with service and education providers for individuals with ID. We performed exome sequencing and analysis, and clinical variant interpretation for each recruited family.

RESULTS: All five families enrolled in the study opted-in for the return of genetic results. In three out of five families exome sequencing analysis identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in KANSL1, TUSC3, and MED13L genes. Families discussed the results and any potential medical follow-up in an appointment with a board certified clinical geneticist.

CONCLUSION: Our study suggests high yield of exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool in adult patients with ID who have not undergone comprehensive sequencing-based genetic testing. Research studies including an option of return of results through a genetic clinic could help minimize the disparity in exome diagnostic testing between pediatric and adult patients with ID.

}, keywords = {Adult, Female, Genetic Testing, Humans, Independent Living, Intellectual Disability, Male, Mediator Complex, Membrane Proteins, Nuclear Proteins, Patient Selection, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Whole Exome Sequencing}, issn = {2324-9269}, doi = {10.1002/mgg3.1439}, author = {Sabo, Aniko and Murdock, David and Dugan, Shannon and Meng, Qingchang and Gingras, Marie-Claude and Hu, Jianhong and Muzny, Donna and Gibbs, Richard} } @article {89, title = {Genetic diagnoses in epilepsy: The impact of dynamic exome analysis in a pediatric cohort.}, journal = {Epilepsia}, volume = {61}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 02}, pages = {249-258}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the yield of systematic analysis and/or reanalysis of whole exome sequencing (WES) data from a cohort of well-phenotyped pediatric patients with epilepsy and suspected but previously undetermined genetic etiology.

METHODS: We identified and phenotyped 125 participants with pediatric epilepsy. Etiology was unexplained at the time of enrollment despite clinical testing, which included chromosomal microarray (57 patients), epilepsy gene panel (n = 48), both (n = 28), or WES (n = 8). Clinical epilepsy diagnoses included developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome, Rasmussen encephalitis, and other focal and generalized epilepsies. We analyzed WES data and compared the yield in participants with and without prior clinical genetic testing.

RESULTS: Overall, we identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 40\% (50/125) of our study participants. Nine patients with DEE had genetic variants in recently published genes that had not been recognized as epilepsy-related at the time of clinical testing (FGF12, GABBR1, GABBR2, ITPA, KAT6A, PTPN23, RHOBTB2, SATB2), and eight patients had genetic variants in candidate epilepsy genes (CAMTA1, FAT3, GABRA6, HUWE1, PTCHD1). Ninety participants had concomitant or subsequent clinical genetic testing, which was ultimately explanatory for 26\% (23/90). Of the 67 participants whose molecular diagnoses were "unsolved" through clinical genetic testing, we identified pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in 17 (25\%).

SIGNIFICANCE: Our data argue for early consideration of WES with iterative reanalysis for patients with epilepsy, particularly those with DEE or epilepsy with intellectual disability. Rigorous analysis of WES data of well-phenotyped patients with epilepsy leads to a broader understanding of gene-specific phenotypic spectra as well as candidate disease gene identification. We illustrate the dynamic nature of genetic diagnosis over time, with analysis and in some cases reanalysis of exome data leading to the identification of disease-associated variants among participants with previously nondiagnostic results from a variety of clinical testing strategies.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Age of Onset, Brain Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Chromosomes, Human, Cohort Studies, Epilepsy, Epilepsy, Generalized, Exome, Female, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Humans, Infant, Male, Microarray Analysis, Phenotype, Whole Exome Sequencing, Young Adult}, issn = {1528-1167}, doi = {10.1111/epi.16427}, author = {Rochtus, Anne and Olson, Heather E and Smith, Lacey and Keith, Louisa G and El Achkar, Christelle and Taylor, Alan and Mahida, Sonal and Park, Meredith and Kelly, McKenna and Shain, Catherine and Rockowitz, Shira and Rosen Sheidley, Beth and Poduri, Annapurna} } @article {114, title = {A structural variation reference for medical and population genetics.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {581}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 05}, pages = {444-451}, abstract = {

Structural variants (SVs) rearrange large segments of DNA and can have profound consequences in evolution and human disease. As national biobanks, disease-association studies, and clinical genetic testing have grown increasingly reliant on genome sequencing, population references such as the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) have become integral in the interpretation of single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). However, there are no reference maps of SVs from high-coverage genome sequencing comparable to those for SNVs. Here we present a reference of sequence-resolved SVs constructed from 14,891 genomes across diverse global populations (54\% non-European) in gnomAD. We discovered a rich and complex landscape of 433,371 SVs, from which we estimate that SVs are responsible for 25-29\% of all rare protein-truncating events per genome. We found strong correlations between natural selection against damaging SNVs and rare SVs that disrupt or duplicate protein-coding sequence, which suggests that genes that are highly intolerant to loss-of-function are also sensitive to increased dosage. We also uncovered modest selection against noncoding SVs in cis-regulatory elements, although selection against protein-truncating SVs was stronger than all noncoding effects. Finally, we identified very large (over one megabase), rare SVs in 3.9\% of samples, and estimate that 0.13\% of individuals may carry an SV that meets the existing criteria for clinically important incidental findings. This SV resource is freely distributed via the gnomAD browser and will have broad utility in population genetics, disease-association studies, and diagnostic screening.

}, keywords = {Continental Population Groups, Disease, Female, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Genetics, Medical, Genetics, Population, Genome, Human, Genotyping Techniques, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Reference Standards, Selection, Genetic, Whole Genome Sequencing}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/s41586-020-2287-8}, author = {Collins, Ryan L and Brand, Harrison and Karczewski, Konrad J and Zhao, Xuefang and Alf{\"o}ldi, Jessica and Francioli, Laurent C and Khera, Amit V and Lowther, Chelsea and Gauthier, Laura D and Wang, Harold and Watts, Nicholas A and Solomonson, Matthew and O{\textquoteright}Donnell-Luria, Anne and Baumann, Alexander and Munshi, Ruchi and Walker, Mark and Whelan, Christopher W and Huang, Yongqing and Brookings, Ted and Sharpe, Ted and Stone, Matthew R and Valkanas, Elise and Fu, Jack and Tiao, Grace and Laricchia, Kristen M and Ruano-Rubio, Valentin and Stevens, Christine and Gupta, Namrata and Cusick, Caroline and Margolin, Lauren and Taylor, Kent D and Lin, Henry J and Rich, Stephen S and Post, Wendy S and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Rotter, Jerome I and Nusbaum, Chad and Philippakis, Anthony and Lander, Eric and Gabriel, Stacey and Neale, Benjamin M and Kathiresan, Sekar and Daly, Mark J and Banks, Eric and MacArthur, Daniel G and Talkowski, Michael E} } @article {38, title = {Analysis of predicted loss-of-function variants in UK Biobank identifies variants protective for disease.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {9}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Apr 24}, pages = {1613}, abstract = {

Less than 3\% of protein-coding genetic variants are predicted to result in loss of protein function through the introduction of a stop codon, frameshift, or the disruption of an essential splice site; however, such predicted loss-of-function (pLOF) variants provide insight into effector transcript and direction of biological effect. In >400,000 UK Biobank participants, we conduct association analyses of 3759 pLOF variants with six metabolic traits, six cardiometabolic diseases, and twelve additional diseases. We identified 18 new low-frequency or rare (allele frequency < 5\%) pLOF variant-phenotype associations. pLOF variants in the gene GPR151 protect against obesity and type 2 diabetes, in the gene IL33 against asthma and allergic disease, and in the gene IFIH1 against hypothyroidism. In the gene PDE3B, pLOF variants associate with elevated height, improved body fat distribution and protection from coronary artery disease. Our findings prioritize genes for which pharmacologic mimics of pLOF variants may lower risk for disease.

}, keywords = {Databases, Genetic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Disease, Gene Frequency, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Humans, Obesity, Phenotype, Proteins, Respiratory Hypersensitivity, United Kingdom}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-03911-8}, author = {Emdin, Connor A and Khera, Amit V and Chaffin, Mark and Klarin, Derek and Natarajan, Pradeep and Aragam, Krishna and Haas, Mary and Bick, Alexander and Zekavat, Seyedeh M and Nomura, Akihiro and Ardissino, Diego and Wilson, James G and Schunkert, Heribert and McPherson, Ruth and Watkins, Hugh and Elosua, Roberto and Bown, Matthew J and Samani, Nilesh J and Baber, Usman and Erdmann, Jeanette and Gupta, Namrata and Danesh, John and Chasman, Daniel and Ridker, Paul and Denny, Joshua and Bastarache, Lisa and Lichtman, Judith H and D{\textquoteright}Onofrio, Gail and Mattera, Jennifer and Spertus, John A and Sheu, Wayne H-H and Taylor, Kent D and Psaty, Bruce M and Rich, Stephen S and Post, Wendy and Rotter, Jerome I and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Krumholz, Harlan and Saleheen, Danish and Gabriel, Stacey and Kathiresan, Sekar} }