@article {131, title = {A missense variant in Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component 1 gene and protection against liver disease.}, journal = {PLoS Genet}, volume = {16}, year = {2020}, month = {2020 04}, pages = {e1008629}, abstract = {

Analyzing 12,361 all-cause cirrhosis cases and 790,095 controls from eight cohorts, we identify a common missense variant in the Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component 1 gene (MARC1 p.A165T) that associates with protection from all-cause cirrhosis (OR 0.91, p = 2.3*10-11). This same variant also associates with lower levels of hepatic fat on computed tomographic imaging and lower odds of physician-diagnosed fatty liver as well as lower blood levels of alanine transaminase (-0.025 SD, 3.7*10-43), alkaline phosphatase (-0.025 SD, 1.2*10-37), total cholesterol (-0.030 SD, p = 1.9*10-36) and LDL cholesterol (-0.027 SD, p = 5.1*10-30) levels. We identified a series of additional MARC1 alleles (low-frequency missense p.M187K and rare protein-truncating p.R200Ter) that also associated with lower cholesterol levels, liver enzyme levels and reduced risk of cirrhosis (0 cirrhosis cases for 238 R200Ter carriers versus 17,046 cases of cirrhosis among 759,027 non-carriers, p = 0.04) suggesting that deficiency of the MARC1 enzyme may lower blood cholesterol levels and protect against cirrhosis.

}, keywords = {Alleles, Cholesterol, LDL, Coronary Artery Disease, Datasets as Topic, Fatty Liver, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Homozygote, Humans, Liver, Liver Cirrhosis, Liver Cirrhosis, Alcoholic, Loss of Function Mutation, Male, Middle Aged, Mitochondrial Proteins, Mutation, Missense, Oxidoreductases}, issn = {1553-7404}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pgen.1008629}, author = {Emdin, Connor A and Haas, Mary E and Khera, Amit V and Aragam, Krishna and Chaffin, Mark and Klarin, Derek and Hindy, George and Jiang, Lan and Wei, Wei-Qi and Feng, Qiping and Karjalainen, Juha and Havulinna, Aki and Kiiskinen, Tuomo and Bick, Alexander and Ardissino, Diego and Wilson, James G and Schunkert, Heribert and McPherson, Ruth and Watkins, Hugh and Elosua, Roberto and Bown, Matthew J and Samani, Nilesh J and Baber, Usman and Erdmann, Jeanette and Gupta, Namrata and Danesh, John and Saleheen, Danish and Chang, Kyong-Mi and Vujkovic, Marijana and Voight, Ben and Damrauer, Scott and Lynch, Julie and Kaplan, David and Serper, Marina and Tsao, Philip and Mercader, Josep and Hanis, Craig and Daly, Mark and Denny, Joshua and Gabriel, Stacey and Kathiresan, Sekar} } @article {38, title = {Analysis of predicted loss-of-function variants in UK Biobank identifies variants protective for disease.}, journal = {Nat Commun}, volume = {9}, year = {2018}, month = {2018 Apr 24}, pages = {1613}, abstract = {

Less than 3\% of protein-coding genetic variants are predicted to result in loss of protein function through the introduction of a stop codon, frameshift, or the disruption of an essential splice site; however, such predicted loss-of-function (pLOF) variants provide insight into effector transcript and direction of biological effect. In >400,000 UK Biobank participants, we conduct association analyses of 3759 pLOF variants with six metabolic traits, six cardiometabolic diseases, and twelve additional diseases. We identified 18 new low-frequency or rare (allele frequency < 5\%) pLOF variant-phenotype associations. pLOF variants in the gene GPR151 protect against obesity and type 2 diabetes, in the gene IL33 against asthma and allergic disease, and in the gene IFIH1 against hypothyroidism. In the gene PDE3B, pLOF variants associate with elevated height, improved body fat distribution and protection from coronary artery disease. Our findings prioritize genes for which pharmacologic mimics of pLOF variants may lower risk for disease.

}, keywords = {Databases, Genetic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Disease, Gene Frequency, Genetic Testing, Genetic Variation, Humans, Obesity, Phenotype, Proteins, Respiratory Hypersensitivity, United Kingdom}, issn = {2041-1723}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-018-03911-8}, author = {Emdin, Connor A and Khera, Amit V and Chaffin, Mark and Klarin, Derek and Natarajan, Pradeep and Aragam, Krishna and Haas, Mary and Bick, Alexander and Zekavat, Seyedeh M and Nomura, Akihiro and Ardissino, Diego and Wilson, James G and Schunkert, Heribert and McPherson, Ruth and Watkins, Hugh and Elosua, Roberto and Bown, Matthew J and Samani, Nilesh J and Baber, Usman and Erdmann, Jeanette and Gupta, Namrata and Danesh, John and Chasman, Daniel and Ridker, Paul and Denny, Joshua and Bastarache, Lisa and Lichtman, Judith H and D{\textquoteright}Onofrio, Gail and Mattera, Jennifer and Spertus, John A and Sheu, Wayne H-H and Taylor, Kent D and Psaty, Bruce M and Rich, Stephen S and Post, Wendy and Rotter, Jerome I and Chen, Yii-Der Ida and Krumholz, Harlan and Saleheen, Danish and Gabriel, Stacey and Kathiresan, Sekar} } @article {21, title = {Polygenic Risk Score Identifies Subgroup With Higher Burden of Atherosclerosis and Greater Relative Benefit From Statin Therapy in the Primary Prevention Setting.}, journal = {Circulation}, volume = {135}, year = {2017}, month = {2017 May 30}, pages = {2091-2101}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Relative risk reduction with statin therapy has been consistent across nearly all subgroups studied to date. However, in analyses of 2 randomized controlled primary prevention trials (ASCOT [Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Lipid-Lowering Arm] and JUPITER [Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin]), statin therapy led to a greater relative risk reduction among a subgroup at high genetic risk. Here, we aimed to confirm this observation in a third primary prevention randomized controlled trial. In addition, we assessed whether those at high genetic risk had a greater burden of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.

METHODS: We studied participants from a randomized controlled trial of primary prevention with statin therapy (WOSCOPS [West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study]; n=4910) and 2 observational cohort studies (CARDIA [Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults] and BioImage; n=1154 and 4392, respectively). For each participant, we calculated a polygenic risk score derived from up to 57 common DNA sequence variants previously associated with coronary heart disease. We compared the relative efficacy of statin therapy in those at high genetic risk (top quintile of polygenic risk score) versus all others (WOSCOPS), as well as the association between the polygenic risk score and coronary artery calcification (CARDIA) and carotid artery plaque burden (BioImage).

RESULTS: Among WOSCOPS trial participants at high genetic risk, statin therapy was associated with a relative risk reduction of 44\% (95\% confidence interval [CI], 22-60; <0.001), whereas in all others, the relative risk reduction was 24\% (95\% CI, 8-37; =0.004) despite similar low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering. In a study-level meta-analysis across the WOSCOPS, ASCOT, and JUPITER primary prevention, relative risk reduction in those at high genetic risk was 46\% versus 26\% in all others ( for heterogeneity=0.05). Across all 3 studies, the absolute risk reduction with statin therapy was 3.6\% (95\% CI, 2.0-5.1) among those in the high genetic risk group and 1.3\% (95\% CI, 0.6-1.9) in all others. Each 1-SD increase in the polygenic risk score was associated with 1.32-fold (95\% CI, 1.04-1.68) greater likelihood of having coronary artery calcification and 9.7\% higher (95\% CI, 2.2-17.8) burden of carotid plaque.

CONCLUSIONS: Those at high genetic risk have a greater burden of subclinical atherosclerosis and derive greater relative and absolute benefit from statin therapy to prevent a first coronary heart disease event.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT00738725 (BioImage) and NCT00005130 (CARDIA). WOSCOPS was carried out and completed before the requirement for clinical trial registration.

}, keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Atherosclerosis, Cohort Studies, Cost of Illness, Female, Humans, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Male, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Young Adult}, issn = {1524-4539}, doi = {10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024436}, author = {Natarajan, Pradeep and Young, Robin and Stitziel, Nathan O and Padmanabhan, Sandosh and Baber, Usman and Mehran, Roxana and Sartori, Samantha and Fuster, Valentin and Reilly, Dermot F and Butterworth, Adam and Rader, Daniel J and Ford, Ian and Sattar, Naveed and Kathiresan, Sekar} } @article {8, title = {Genetic Risk, Adherence to a Healthy Lifestyle, and Coronary Disease.}, journal = {N Engl J Med}, volume = {375}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Dec 15}, pages = {2349-2358}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Both genetic and lifestyle factors contribute to individual-level risk of coronary artery disease. The extent to which increased genetic risk can be offset by a healthy lifestyle is unknown.

METHODS: Using a polygenic score of DNA sequence polymorphisms, we quantified genetic risk for coronary artery disease in three prospective cohorts - 7814 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, 21,222 in the Women{\textquoteright}s Genome Health Study (WGHS), and 22,389 in the Malm{\"o} Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) - and in 4260 participants in the cross-sectional BioImage Study for whom genotype and covariate data were available. We also determined adherence to a healthy lifestyle among the participants using a scoring system consisting of four factors: no current smoking, no obesity, regular physical activity, and a healthy diet.

RESULTS: The relative risk of incident coronary events was 91\% higher among participants at high genetic risk (top quintile of polygenic scores) than among those at low genetic risk (bottom quintile of polygenic scores) (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95\% confidence interval [CI], 1.75 to 2.09). A favorable lifestyle (defined as at least three of the four healthy lifestyle factors) was associated with a substantially lower risk of coronary events than an unfavorable lifestyle (defined as no or only one healthy lifestyle factor), regardless of the genetic risk category. Among participants at high genetic risk, a favorable lifestyle was associated with a 46\% lower relative risk of coronary events than an unfavorable lifestyle (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95\% CI, 0.47 to 0.63). This finding corresponded to a reduction in the standardized 10-year incidence of coronary events from 10.7\% for an unfavorable lifestyle to 5.1\% for a favorable lifestyle in ARIC, from 4.6\% to 2.0\% in WGHS, and from 8.2\% to 5.3\% in MDCS. In the BioImage Study, a favorable lifestyle was associated with significantly less coronary-artery calcification within each genetic risk category.

CONCLUSIONS: Across four studies involving 55,685 participants, genetic and lifestyle factors were independently associated with susceptibility to coronary artery disease. Among participants at high genetic risk, a favorable lifestyle was associated with a nearly 50\% lower relative risk of coronary artery disease than was an unfavorable lifestyle. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

}, keywords = {Aged, Cohort Studies, Coronary Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Healthy Lifestyle, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Multifactorial Inheritance, Patient Compliance, Polymorphism, Genetic, Risk}, issn = {1533-4406}, doi = {10.1056/NEJMoa1605086}, author = {Khera, Amit V and Emdin, Connor A and Drake, Isabel and Natarajan, Pradeep and Bick, Alexander G and Cook, Nancy R and Chasman, Daniel I and Baber, Usman and Mehran, Roxana and Rader, Daniel J and Fuster, Valentin and Boerwinkle, Eric and Melander, Olle and Orho-Melander, Marju and Ridker, Paul M and Kathiresan, Sekar} }